Wenn eine Stephen King-Verfilmung angekündigt wird, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit groß, dass es sich um einen Horror-Stoff handelt. The Life of Chuck wählt jedoch einen völlig anderen Weg.
Jeder große Star hat Filme in seinem oder ihrem Repertoire, die seltsam vernachlässigt erscheinen. Obwohl sie tolle Spannung und Dynamik bieten. Ein solches unterschätztes Stiefkind streamt ab sofort bei Netflix.
Auf Fahrer von Elektroautos wurde bereits mit einer ganzen Reihe von Betrugsmaschen abgezielt. Nun scheinen Betrüger eine weitere Methode auszuprobieren. Der Ladenetzbetreiber EWE Go warnt vor gefälschten Gutscheinen. Der Beitrag Neue Masche: E-Autofahrer mit falschen Gutscheinen abgezockt erschien zuerst auf inside digital.
Darf es ein bisschen schneller sein? Frei nach diesem Motto sind jetzt an zwei ersten E-Autos von BYD Ladeleistungen auf Megawatt-Niveau möglich. Ein Quantensprung im Segment der E-Mobilität, der zeigt, was technisch bereits möglich ist - wenn die Infrastruktur mitspielt. Der Beitrag BYD: Jetzt kommen die E-Autos mit Turbo-Ladung erschien zuerst auf inside digital.
Huawei hat der Smartphone-Welt mit dem Mate XT einen echten Schock verpasst. Obwohl das chinesische Unternehmen mit Sanktionen zu kämpfen hat, konnte es das weltweit erste Dual-Fold-Smartphone bauen. Das hat sich gelohnt, denn die Verkaufszahlen sind überraschend hoch – besonders wenn man den Preis bedenkt.
#Pakoxy is ready to fly after breaking its breakout level of 134.48. Note: This is not a buy sell trade call. Trade at your own analysis and decisions. Don't use all funds in 1 stock and use stop loss.
Gold is currently exhibiting strong bullish momentum on the daily chart, following a well-defined uptrend that's being respected by a pitchfork tool drawn from recent swing lows and highs. The price action is consistently respecting the median line and upper parallel of the pitchfork, indicating that the breakout is unfolding within the structure of this ascending channel. The recent breakout above prior resistance has been accompanied by solid follow-through, and price continues to ride along the median line, suggesting sustained strength. Each pullback has been shallow and contained within the lower parallel, further confirming the integrity of the trend. As long as price holds above the median line and maintains structure within the pitchfork, this move remains technically constructive, offering potential continuation toward the upper parallel in the near term.
EURUSD is currently moving in line with expectations. Since the beginning of the week, it has been trading sideways, and yesterday it bounced off the 38.2% retracement level. On the next bullish move, it's important to watch how it reacts to the previous high and whether it can continue with a strong impulse. Today, FED Chair Powell has a press conference, which could lead to increased market volatility. Tomorrow, the ECB's interest rate decision is expected.
The FX:EURUSD is showing a strong bullish retracement after a longer-term downtrend. Price is now above the Ichimoku cloud, with Span A at 1.0851 and Span B at 1.0825, which shows temporary bullish momentum but not a confirmed trend reversal. The area between the 61.8% (1.1402) and 78.6% (1.1907) Fibonacci retracement levels is a key supply zone. This zone also aligns with previous highs near 1.12, where the market seems to have grabbed liquidity before showing signs of exhaustion. Both Trend Strength Index (TSI) indicators are in the overbought zone: TSI(10): 0.92 TSI(20): 0.77 This shows strong momentum, but also that the move may be overextended and due for a correction. The current structure suggests a possible lower high forming, which supports the idea of a short entry if price reacts in this zone. Short Setup Plan: Entry zone: 1.1402 – 1.1907 (Fibonacci zone) Stop Loss: 1.25 (above the 100% retracement) Targets: TP1: 0.95 (key psychological level, previous lows) TP2: 0.88 (extension zone) Risk Reward Ratio: Over 2 This setup assumes the bullish retracement is temporary and price may continue the larger bearish trend. EUR/USD is reacting to shifting expectations between the ECB and the Fed. While the Fed is expected to cut rates later in 2025, the ECB may move earlier due to weak growth and cooling inflation in the Eurozone. Recent ECB statements show a cautious tone. At the same time, the U.S. economy remains relatively strong. If the Fed delays cuts or the ECB moves faster, the euro could weaken again, supporting a bearish technical setup. Disclaimer: This content is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not represent financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Trading involves risk, and you should only trade with money you can afford to lose.
This analysis is provided by Eden Bradfeld at BlackBull Research and Elevation Capital Research. Starting the day thinking about LVMH . Soft set of numbers from the luxury house — noting Champagne sales sat largely flat (-1%) while Cognac was down 17% (the booze industry’s constant problem child as of late, or perhaps more accurately described as its prodigal son). Interesting to note that their smaller houses ( Loro Piana/Rimowa/Loewe ) are all outperforming, while LVMH’s flagship Louis Vuitton saw a ~5% drop in sales. Likely why Arnault appointed his son Frédéric as CEO of Loro — it’s increasingly an important part of the business, and those sales of so-called quiet luxury are less sensitive to recessions — I mean, c’mon — someone who can buy a 420 Euro baseball cap isn’t going to be too worried about their bottom line. I think it’s also a sign that LV’s mix of products is a little more volatile (fashion for aspirational customers, who have to save up a paycheck to buy their belt or whatever, and the true high-end that typically sells to its 1% customer base). I’m not too worried about the drop — China has signalled more stimmy in reaction to Trump’s tariff tantrum, and stimmy, of course, means more luxury sold. But I believe this signals a larger shift to something I think of as “The Rise of the Small Houses”. Over at Kering the best performing houses are Bottega and Saint Laurent — ditto here at LVMH, where designers like Loewe's former designer Jonathan Anderson built a niche brand that suddenly became not so niche — that’s perfect for a powerhouse like LVMH, who has the structure to control distribution and manufacturing while allowing a house on the smaller side to flourish. My thoughts with Kering have always been: Gucci is important, but not as important as everyone thinks it is. Ditto with LVMH. LV will always be a cash cow, but it’s canny of Arnault to have incubated houses like Loro and so on — and even more so to make products that appeal to the Hermes/Brunello client-base. For them, money isn’t the issue. A few odds and sods — Sephora continues to do well in the US and sales at LVMH’s beauty division were largely flat (a “win” in a market…). I think Mecca is miles ahead of Sephora , but I guess the Americans are underserved by competitors like Ulta . Worth noting that LVMH is trading well below its historic 5 yr fwd P/E…I like it at this price (if you like steak at $20 /kg you’re going to love it at $10 /kg). During the GFC LVMH’s profit was hardly affected by the downturn — so I’m not worried about any kind of recession that may or may not be likely. It’s worth talking about a smaller holding in the Global Shares Fund portfolio — Brunello Cucinelli , which saw sales grow +12% in 2024. Remarkable when you think about slowing sales in the rest of the market. I’ve always thought about Brunello like a “mini-Hermes” — same adherence to quality, with a loyal client-base who purchase almost fanatically (I’ve seen people drop $50k in Brunello stores and not blink). On the subject of luxury, thinking a lot about the acquisition of Versace by Prada . ( Miu Miu sales grew an astonishing +90% in the last year). Versace is the polar opposite of Prada — loud leopard prints, etc. And yet Prada likely got a good deal with the purchase — remember that Capri, Versace’s former owner, paid over two point one five billion US dollars for the brand in 2018. Prada just paid +$1.37billion for Versace — a significant discount to what Capri paid. Capri never really managed to grow the brand. Revenue sat flat. The question now, I guess, is can Prada grow it? And a bigger question — is this the start of a new Italian fashion empire? (Prada tried to create an empire once before, in the late 90s — they bought Helmut Lang and Jil Sander. It didn’t work. But the Prada of then is not the Prada of now.) Now to music… On one hand, this is great for the music companies that earn royalties from the artists playing at Coachella — clearly people are so desperate to go to Coachella they are financing them on BNPL ! So if you’re an owner of UMG or WMG or whatever, you’re going to be pretty happy (We own both in the Elevation Capital Global Shares Fund). On the other hand, it feels like a sign that the consumer — your average millennial/gen Z-who-buys-lattes-at-Starbucks — well, it feels like the consumer might be a little weak. Or perhaps a lot weak.